Why is it that so many of us become so passionate
about the subject of worship; and more particularly, what we do when we
worship? I cannot think of a
denomination which does not have ongoing discussions over who should
participate (from the front), what should be sung, what role (if any) preaching
should play; and so on. One reason, I
am certain, is that in the worship of God we like to be creatures of habit; and
so whatever we have become accustomed to from an early age becomes dear and
personal to us. We like to worship God
each Sunday with words, music and ways of doing things that we know well. Now, before some of you add: “but I like fresh, contemporary, daring
words and music - I’m tired of all that old traditional stuff!”, let me suggest
that maybe this occurs to you precisely because all that fresh, contemporary
daring stuff is just what you have listened to for hours, days and years on your
radio, through your stereo and mile after mile in your car. It is familiar, comfortable and (yes)
traditional, through habitual use, to you!!
It is true that what we choose
to make our habits will become our preference; and even our idea of what should
be. Historians tell us that Christians
through the ages have counted it a very precious thing to grow up with good
habits of worship to God. Others remind
us that what is ingrained in our hearts through constant use will inspire our
unconscious thoughts as well as our conscious ones. If it be God-honouring, who knows what blessing it may be when
the day of trial comes?
Let me explain further. I grew up in the Church of England; and was
privileged to become familiar with the Book
of Common Prayer (1662) before it was largely replaced by the 1970 New Zealand Liturgy. As you are probably aware, Anglican worship
consists of written prayers with written responses (said out loud by the
congregation); as well as the singing of psalms and hymns, preaching and the
sacraments. So, each week people follow
the service, using the same words, from their prayer book. Thus the words that are said and sung,
through constant use, become familiar, very familiar, and indeed memorised, by
regular churchgoers. Now, the beauty in
all this is that the words Cranmer originally wrote are doctrinally rich,
profound words, closely drawn from Scripture, and worthy of being
memorised. Much of the liturgy actually
is Scripture, and because it is
repeated often, it has been stored up in the hearts of Anglicans for
centuries. For instance, the weekly
reminder to “Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works
and glorify your Father, who is in heaven” has been an inspiration to live
openly as a Christian, especially in times of difficulty, so that others may
glorify God the Father. The prayers of
confession are articulate, graceful statements of true teaching. For example,
in Evensong Anglicans confess: “we have
erred and strayed from Thy ways like lost sheep, and there is no health in
us”. Such prayer, if taken to heart by
frequent use, is an inestimable blessing.
Memorised truths become an almost unconscious prompt to righteous
responses.
Another part of the Prayer
Book heritage has been the regular singing of psalms to chants.* The
boarding school I attended had a chaplain with considerable musical talents -
and a way with teenagers, I consider, in reflection! In the 1970s, it certainly was not the coolest thing you
ever did, to sing the psalms to 17th and 18th century English chant tunes. (Our baby boomer music diet fed us the
immediately appealing but unnourishing fare of
Neil Diamond and John Denver).
However, chapel services had us chanting psalms daily, and we grew to
love this form of singing. Musically, Anglican psalm chants are rich and
rewarding; and entirely appropriate to the words they were intended to
carry. But the best thing of all was
that we were singing the actual words of Scripture; and what we were memorising
was worth memorising. To this day I still remember parts of psalms
and even whole psalms because of these chants.
Well, I am not advocating the use of the Book of Common Prayer in our worship services. My point is simply that good worship
practices which are true, noble, and the very best which we have to offer to
God are those which will in turn teach us what is true and sound and wholesome,
from our childhood up. We can be
pleased to use them, loving them dearly as we use them again and again, and as
they become ingrained in our hearts.
That was not the end of the
story for me, however. I was in my late
teens when I came to faith in Christ; and at that time, the charismatic
movement was new, exciting, and fast-growing.
Charismatic friends led me to Christ, and for some years I had a
thorough exposure to charismatic worship.
Why did I go that way? I had
become a Christian, and the church (denomination) I had grown up in was
liberal. It did not teach the truth,
and I did not know at that time that there were any churches other than liberal
and charismatic (the important thing, it seemed to me, at 18, was to worship in
a place where the Scriptures were actually believed). Indeed, today, these two types of church still dominate the New
Zealand spiritual landscape.
The emphasis in charismatic
worship, it appeared to me, was on the novel, the spontaneous, and the
daring. It was considered spiritually
brave, or taking a stand for God, to try new things which might make you seem
ridiculous in the sight of other people.
However, at the same time there was something hypnoptically comfortable
for people in knowing they could come to worship and expect the same sorts of
things to happen. They came knowing
they would sing songs which were catchy, easy to learn, and would probably be
memorised in one morning service. They
knew that they would always get the same sorts of feelings from singing those
songs, an uplifting, emotionally-sensitised feeling toward God (that is why
some songs are called “anointed” by people who move in these circles); and they
would feel sorry for people who did not get to worship in that way. Other aspects of worship also followed a
familiar pattern. There was always a
series of especially emotionally-charged songs which led into a time of
hand-raising and people murmuring quietly “in tongues.” Increasingly, though, I was aware that there
was a discordant gap between the informality and, yes, sensuality of this type
of worship, and the desire for knowledge and truth which I thought Christians
ought to have. Christians, I was sure,
needed a deeper understanding of solid, unchanging truths if they were to deal
with the serious difficulties which they face in a sinful world. It somehow wasn’t enough to have a flush of
excitement during Sunday services.
It was through my university
studies that I was introduced to the Puritans, and became captivated by their
courageous stand for the purity of worship; driven as it was by their deep and
attractive consciousness of personal sin. Their example certainly gave me
second thoughts about how I prayed to God, and about singing the seventeen
words of “This is the Day” seven times over!
On heading for graduate study in the U.S. I determined to learn a lot
more about the Puritans and their understanding of the Christian faith. This, as it happened, was not just to be
through my studies. I also had the
opportunity to spend three years at Tenth Presbyterian Church in Philadelphia,
and there was introduced to the Reformed faith, and to the Presbyterian
tradition of worship; which has common roots with the Puritan tradition. There I learned about the primary importance
of preaching, and the value of solemn, reverent, well-articulated and
considered extemporary prayer led by sound men in the faith. There was also considerable care given to
the choice of hymns. The Presbyterian
and Puritan tradition has always emphasised the primacy of preaching, and there
is concern that nothing should distract the congregation’s attention from it. Often, there are two or three hymns only;
and through history faithful
Presbyterians have tried to avoid all liturgical forms which excessively
gratify the senses or threaten to become mere entertainment (beautiful choral
interludes, unnecessary church decoration, extravagant ministerial dress, etc). There is also a deliberate effort
to regard only Sundays as “special” days (ie there is no observance of church
calendars), lest the people confuse comfortable traditions with the plain
truth. This, of course, has been in
contradistinction to Anglican, and some continental reformed traditions.
Fifteen years of worshipping
in conservative Presbyterian churches gave me a lasting appreciation of these
things. I certainly learned a great
deal about Who we worship, and why and how.
But in a sense, there was more to learn; and since we have become part
of the Reformed churches we have increasingly appreciated the part fine hymn
and psalm singing plays in Christian worship.
They do much to teach us truth and store it up in our hearts. The repeating of the historic creeds of the
Christian church, and the use of responsive readings and forms for prayers have
also helped revive my respect for and increase my understanding of the beauty,
order and scriptural origins of the Book
of Common Prayer. It has simply
reminded us that churches with a reformational heritage have traditions of
worship which honour God, and which nourish us, as believers, in the
faith. And, in common with each other
(despite regional variations in patterns of worship practice) their way of
worshipping God is driven by scriptural truth; and by recognition of God’s
holiness and man’s sinfulness.
All these experiences went a
long way in explaining to me why Puritans, Presbyterians, Continental Reformers
and Anglicans share a great deal in their practice of worship. It also reinforced in my mind the value of
continuing patterns of worship which have come down to us from our rich
reformational heritage. Forms of
worship and fine, theologically-profound hymns which have been tested by
generations of faithful churches, go far to teach us how to worship God. They also, through continued use, store up for us in our hearts truths which
will enable us to stand fast when the storm winds of trial test us. We should be grateful for what we have
received when we hear, sing and repeat words which our churches have used to
worship God through the centuries.
After all we, no less than they, need to learn these truths.
* Chanting psalms is simply singing them in original Hebrew poetic form [ in their English translation], to a melodic formula - as opposed to singing them in modified, western verse form to tunes with regular rhythms (as with the metrical psalms). The rhythm of chanting reflects the irregular stresses of speech rather than the regular rhythm of 3/4 time, etc. Some have called chanting “intensified speech”, since it easily allows for stresses on the significant words in a sentence, proper punctuation, etc. Psalm chants are not limited to plainchant, or Gregorian chant. Protestant psalm chants (as practised primarily in Lutheran and Anglican worship) are not Gregorian, and are significantly different in content and style to those sung in the Roman Catholic tradition. They are suitable for congregational singing.
Faith in Focus /NZ Reformed Church / gmilne@xtra.co.nz / revised May
2000 / Copyright 2000